When you purchase through nexus on our site , we may earn an affiliate commission . Here ’s how it works .
In the long time of Google and Wikipedia , one can in theory find any fact at any hr of the day . But still the head remains : Can we believe what we read ?
A.J. Jacobs , humorist and author of the New York Times best seller , " The Know - It - All , " a memoir of the year he spend take all 32 volumes of the 2002 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica , says that trying to figure out the dependableness of information these Clarence Day is a hugely confusing problem .
" I think we ’re all walk around in a big Saharan data sandstorm , " Jacobs say .
But it was n’t always this way . People used to live in an " selective information monarchy , " where the New York Times , the Encyclopedia Britannica , and other top publications localise the touchstone , Jacobs said .
" Now it ’s more of an information democracy , " he added , " or perhaps an information lawlessness , which is outstanding in some ways , since we have so much more info out there , but it lend with it a carload of disarray and chaos and uncertainty . "
get going are the day of door - to - door cyclopaedia salesman . While the Encyclopedia Britannica is still useable in photographic print , most customers get at Britannica online through a subscription that costs $ 69.95 per year . But even the venerable Britannica with its more than 4,000 expert contributor has been now and again criticize for inaccuracy .
When the daybook Nature free event of a study in 2005 that say Wikipedia is nearly as accurate as the Encyclopedia Britannica , the collective place at Encyclopedia Britannica anticipate on the journal to retract the study .
" This study has been cited all over the world , and it ’s invalid , " said Dale Hoiberg , Britannica ’s editor - in - chief , but added that " we in no mode mean to inculpate that Britannica is error - gratuitous ; we have never made such a claim . "
Wikipedia
Wikipedia , the complimentary encyclopedia make by hundred of thousands of volunteers , is grade among the top 10 most visited sites on theInternet . Wikipedia is so democratic now that companies have devised ways for people to access it without acomputer . Openmoko offers the WikiReader , a handheld , touchscreen gimmick that contains Wikipedia ’s 3 million topics .
According to Wikipedia , senior article tend to be more comprehensive and balanced , while fresh article may contain misinformation . A page chronicle is accessible on each article pageboy that provides a book of updates . inferior or argufy information is open to removal .
Unlike a paper reference source , Wikipedia is continually updated , with the macrocosm or updating of articles on historic case within hours , minutes , or even second base .
On - the - go information
Mobile phone users can also get information - on - the - go using text electronic messaging . ChaCha , the top ranked text - ground hunt service accord to Nielsen Mobile , use " guides " who must be at least 18 years one-time , have a gamy - swiftness link to the Internet and a mailing address . Guides are paid by the answer , while the service is detached to users .
New to the textbook - for - response market is KGB ( Knowledge General Bureau ) , which break open onto the prospect with a $ 2.5 million 30 - second office in the third twenty-five percent of last weekend’sSuper Bowl . KGB charges a one dollar bill for each query and pays its " special agents " 10 cents per dubiousness for father their own answer and 5 cents if they practice answers in KGB ’s database .
Despite KGB ’s tv set office show a secret facility staff with expert , the troupe is like to Cha Cha in that it uses individual work at domicile from their own computing gadget .
Rating Googlepedia
But many mass today just useGoogle , Bing and other search engines to incur answers to their questions . In January alone , enquiry firm comScore report Americans conduct 15.2 billion searches – a 3 percent gain over the previous month .
Jacobs say he spends a lot of time seek to figure out what ’s honest . " I consider it ’s important to get two or three independent sources for each fact , " he said . " I care there was a Moody ’s for data reliability . "
In the meantime , Jacobs has come up with an ad hoc , and admittedly unscientific , organization of his own :
• If it ’s in a compeer - reviewed journal , supply three dependability point .
• If it ’s on a website with a fate of ecphonesis point , subtract two dependability point .
• If it ’s in a newspaper with a circulation over 1 million and not sold at market entrepot , add one dependability decimal point .
• If it ’s from a website with a raft of pop up windows for Acai berry supplements , subtract two point .
• If Mark Cuban is linked to the origin , deduct one point .
• If the source blab out about Truth with a Washington " T " , subtract four point .
